Printed from Public Healthy (URL:
http://www.publichealthy.com/academic.aspx
)
Academic public health
Public Health in common with all branches of medicine
requires research as the basis for its practice. It is quite
difficult to define what is and isn't Public Health research, since many
medical projects will have some Public Health implications. However,
studies which involve large numbers of people or which give results
which could apply to large sectors of the population will have more
value to Public Health professionals. These studies will often be
carried out by Universities rather than Public Health departments within
the NHS itself.
Clinical Trial Service Unit
I was based at the
Clinical Trial
Service Unit (CTSU) at Oxford University between August 2005 and
February 2006.
The CTSU amongst other things organises very large
randomised control trials (RCTs) with thousands of participants.
These trials are sometimes termed mega-trials. A larger number of
participants usually gives a trial more statistical weight (or 'power'),
enabling results to be interpreted more soundly. I was involved in
the
SEARCH and ASCEND trials.
SEARCH
SEARCH is investigating the use of high-dose statins for secondary
prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals post-MI, and also
looks at the use of vitamin B12 and folate in secondary prevention.
The use of vitamin B6 and folate following an acute MI
has been questioned after the initial results of the NORVIT
trial. More...
ASCEND
ASCEND is investigating the use of aspirin in primary
prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals with diabetes
mellitus. It is also looking at the use of fish oils in primary
prevention.
Clinical trials in the UK should conform to the International Conference
on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice Guideline E6 - a bit of a
mouthful, but often known as ICH GCP or simply GCP.
ICH
website |
GCP guidelines (pdf, 247kb)
The vast majority of clinical trials will require ethical approval from a
research ethics committee (REC). However, public health service audits
and needs assessments, which might involve just interviewing service staff
and users, may fall into a grey area regarding whether ethical approval
needs to be formally sought. More information on this can be found on
the National Research Ethics Service site and in the paper, below. (Thanks
to Dr Paul Wendon-Blixrud for helping find this information.)
National
Research Ethics Service guidance
Ethics audit and
research: all shades of grey. Wade, DT doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7489.468 [?]
(BMJ, 2005)
There is currently no obligation for investigators to register
clinical trials before conducting them. However pressure is mounting for
compulsory registration to try to prevent:
- publication bias
(investigators submitting and/or journals only publishing 'interesting'
results - usually trials which support the efficacy of a new treatment)
- selective reporting (in which, for example, an 'unwanted' result is
suppressed)
- post-hoc changes to study design (for
example to change statistical analyses in favour of obtaining a
'positive' result, or to attempt to answer a question for which the
original study was not designed).
To this end a number of organisations have sprung up
to allow trialists to voluntarily register their new or ongoing trials,
including:
Current
Controlled Trials database (International) |
Meta-register
IFPMA Clinical Trials portal (International)
National Research Register (UK)
ClinicalTrials.gov (US)
CenterWatch
(US)
To fill the gap between a trial ending and formal
publication of its results is the
Research Findings Register (UK).
Literature searching
PubMed
Google Scholar
The
Cochrane Library
Interpreting the literature
Cochrane Collaboration open learning material
An excellent introduction to how to objectively assess scientific papers