Printed from Public Healthy (URL:
http://www.publichealthy.com/partatips.aspx
)
MFPH part A tips
This page contains some tips for people taking the
MFPH Part A exam. A few of them are
obvious, but hopefully they'll still be a useful reminder. Any feedback/additional tips gratefully
accepted! Good luck!
You might want to bear the following in mind, roughly in order of when
they may be useful to you:
As soon as you know you want to take the MFPH part A
- Check the dates of the next sitting - see the FPH timetable
page - and apply for the exam (sounds obvious, but some people
forget!)
- Size up the job - have a quick look at the
syllabus and some recent
past papers
(2001 on) so you get an idea of how much you know already, and how much
work you've got to do. (Quick warning on the syllabus: some of the
descriptions are quite concise and clear, others aren't - don't be put
off - but by the end you should try to know a bit about every item on
the list.) You can then work out when you want to start revising
properly
- Check dates for revision courses (see below for
more information) if you're able/want to go on one. I found
Ed Jessop's course
invaluable and brilliant value, and also a useful barometer for how my
revision was going. Again, make sure you apply early for any course
- Find out if anyone else you know is taking the exam; some people
find it helpful to revise together (though this is really personal
taste) but it's definitely useful to have a sympathetic ear when you're
frustrated with revision!
When to start revising
- How much revision you need to do, only you can decide. However, I
reckon if you start too early you'll only forget it all!
- Your decision will also depend on whether you are 'revising' or just
'vising' (sorry for the obvious pun) - if you think there's a lot you're
not sure about, or you've not got MSc or MPH experience, then you might
want to think about starting earlier too
- Whether you are doing a full-time day job just before the exam, or
if you have the luxury of some revision leave, will also impact upon how
long before the exam you should start your exam work
Start of revision period
- Get together your revision material
- print out a copy of the
syllabus
- print out some of the
past
papers (if you're only doing a few, go for the most recent, but
only from 2001 onwards in any case)
- buy/borrow any textbooks you think you might need (see
below)
- make sure you know where any notes are from any relevant MSc,
MPH or other course
- Divide up the work. You may want to do this by syllabus section, or
your own headings (I used: General [random bits of information that
didn't seem to fit in elsewhere], Specific topics [e.g. obesity,
environmental health], health protection [e.g. HIV, TB], epidemiology &
stats, health economics, organisations & management)
- Make a revision timetable. You may feel like you're about to take
your GCSEs again, but I find a bit of discipline (and reward - I try to
make sure I have regular days or half-days off) helps. It also means
you can force yourself to concentrate on areas you know you are weak on,
and divide up big topics into manageable portions. I like to keep my
timetable 'dynamic' - I'll update it to reduce the time on areas I'm
comfortable on, and increase the time on more difficult topics
Main revision period
- Do the work!
- It may seem tempting to try to 'wing it' on little revision, or
'bin' topics - but both these strategies (especially the latter,
given that there are very few optional elements to the exam) are
pretty high risk, and you'll kick yourself if you fail without
trying properly. Also, remember how much it's costing you to take
the exam!
- Most of my 'main' work consisted of making notes from books (see
below), looking up topics on the internet (see
below), doing a bit of data manipulation, and regularly (every
day) testing myself on stuff I'd already revised (initially just
topic by topic, then later on by practising past paper questions),
to make sure it stayed in my head!
- Use basic memory/education theory to boost your recall
- 'Active' learning is better than simply reading information -
try to use or manipulate the information while revising - e.g. by
testing yourself after reading some text, or simply making notes
from a book rather than just reading it. Some people like to revise
in groups, with other colleagues who are also taking the exam,
although I find I usually work better 'solo'
- Recall is improved if you revise the same information a few
times, at longer intervals each time
- Different people learn in different ways: if you remember things
more easily if you draw a diagram, then draw diagrams; if you like
mnemonics, then use these; etc.
- Don't work too hard. Attention span is always said to be about
an hour maximum, so try to have a short break after this time,
otherwise you'll not be working efficiently
- Practise exam questions from
past papers
(or similar ones set by yourself)
- Don't feel compelled to do this early on in your revision if you
think it'll knock your confidence - better to get a bit of general
knowledge under your belt, then try
- Practising questions will help make sure your revision is
relevant to the exam you'll be sitting (no point in revising lots of
stuff which you won't be asked), and that you get used to the style
of answer the examiners are looking for
- Although some questions are reused, it's probably a waste of
time trying to learn set answers
- Some people like to write full essays during their revision; I
prefer to write none before the exam at all - just do lots of essay
plans, then mark them according to the Examiners' comments given in
the past papers. Remember, though, there is no exactly 'right' or
'wrong' answer for each question, so don't be put off if yours isn't
identical to that given - but it should be in the same ball-park
- Make sure you're reasonably cognizant of major public health
reports and legislation (see
Public
health policy and legislation) - in particular the Black,
Acheson and Wanless reports
- 'Trendy' topics (e.g. smoking, climate change) may turn up, but
don't bank on it. Remember too that the exam is set (principally)
for the whole of the UK - so questions requiring knowledge of
policies specific to one area/country (e.g. Practice-based
commissioning, England only) are not likely to appear, although
there's no reason why you can't use them as examples in your answers
- Use the
syllabus as a guide
- Don't be intimidated by the size of the syllabus (unless the
'fear factor' helps you!), but you may find it helpful to keep a
note of which topics listed you still have to cover
- Practise critical appraisal
- Some people hate this, for others it's not such a problem.
Either way, it's probably best to practise at least one or two
appraisals (e.g. from the past papers) before the real thing. See
resources, below for some useful websites
- Some advocate trying to read through all the BMJ articles from
the year preceding the exam to guess which might turn up for
critical appraisal; this might work, but there are so many possible
articles that you're probably better off practising general
technique, or doing general revision
- You might find my
critical appraisal framework (pdf, 11kb) adapted and extended
from CASP)
useful as an example
- Practise data handling
- Again, a bit of an individual thing how comfortable you are with
this, but you should make sure you're not too phased by being
asked to calculate directly or indirectly standardised mortality
ratios, numbers needed to treat (NNT), population attributable risk,
sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios, chi-squared etc.
The last few days before the exams
- If practising exam questions, make sure your timing works. You
should be able to do a complete essay plan in about 5 minutes, and full
essays (if you're doing them before the exam) in the allocated time
- Remind yourself of the structure of the papers, how long they are,
and how long you have for each question in the exam. Currently this is:
- Paper 1A - 2½ hours, 6 questions (=25 mins/question)
- Paper 1B - 1½ hours, 4 questions (=22½ mins/question)
- Paper 2A - 2½ hours, critical appraisal and some other questions
- Paper 2B - 1½ hours, data manipulation and summary
- Papers 1A and 1B are on day 1; Papers 2A and 2B on day 2
- Work out some basic 'frameworks', if you find this helpful
- By frameworks, I mean outline structures for questions of a
certain genre - e.g. 'what is the epidemiology of disease x?'
- They are useful to make sure you don't forget to put information
in your answer which you know, but will otherwise not score points
for
- If you decide to use such frameworks you should be careful to
apply them judiciously, and always make sure you answer the question
- don't put in everything you've remembered from your framework just
because you can - you risk not gaining any extra points, and worse,
annoying the examiner. The FPH specifically advises on this point
in their exam blurb, so be warned!
- Remember that everyone's good at remembering some things and not
others. Therefore this may be the time to forcibly insert into your
head - however temporarily - those things you just can't get to stay in
your brain for more than a day or so (for me, the formulae for
confidence intervals had a habit of slipping away if not regularly
used...)
- Work out how you're going to get to the exam hall! Remember that
the exams are spread over two days, so if you've got a very long journey
to the exam you may want to stay over at least one night
During the exams
- Relax! Spend two minutes at the start of each exam reading through
the paper, instead of rushing headlong into writing your answers
- Answer the question (and all of the question)! However tempting it
is to answer a question you know the answer to, rather than that in
front of you, stick to the latter
- Write a brief essay plan for each essay question prior to writing
the answer, to ensure you cover all points and the essay flows
reasonably
- Aim to write roughly 1 side of A4 per 10 minutes of exam time (the
paper you are given is wide ruled, just so you know). This will
obviously vary depending on your handwriting size, but I think mine's
about average, so if yours is extra large or small you should adjust
this accordingly. If you're writing's normally illegible, tidy it up!
- Make sure you answer every question - you can't afford to score a
low mark on any question - so even if you've not written everything you
know about your favourite topic, if you're running out of time, skip to
the next question
- Your literary style is not marked, so don't get overly worried about
fancy sentence construction, so long as you can get the point across
clearly
- Number each sheet according to the instructions given in the exam
- Show all working for data manipulation questions - you may get some
credit for your working even if the end result is incorrect
- Your answers will be farmed out to different examiners to mark, so
write the question number, subsection, and the question itself, at the
top of each answer, so that if the pages get muddled up you still get
the credit you deserve
- Structure your answers with appropriate underlined headings - this
makes it easier to read, and means (i) it shows the examiner you've
understood the question; (ii) it's easier to see where you've made
points which deserve marks; and (iii) puts the examiner in a better
mood, thus predisposing them to give you the benefit of the doubt
elsewhere in the paper! Bullet lists are also acceptable and useful
when used appropriately
- Define how you interpret key terms used in the question at the start
of your answer, e.g. "In this answer I will take 'diabetes' to mean
types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (not diabetes insipidus), and 'local
interventions' to mean those appropriate to the level of the Primary
Care Trust (population ~300,000) in England"
- Take a diplomatic/polite tone when answering questions where you
have to write a letter, press statement, etc. Whilst you should be
honest, and clearly state any facts relevant to the question, you should
also acknowledge other people's opinions or stances, e.g. if you are
responding to an inaccurate press story or pressure group opinion. Note
this is not the same as sitting on the fence - you should still express
your own opinion, just not be unnecessarily rude or inappropriate when
criticising others
- Similarly, use lay language where appropriate, e.g. if writing to a
non-scientific audience
- Give relevant examples in your answers where possible. This shows
breadth of knowledge and confirms you understand the question
- Write what you would do in practice - e.g. if an answer concerns
managing a disease outbreak, you might write that in addition to
everything else you would do, you would still check in a textbook/look
up the disease on the internet, and consult colleagues with experience
in handling such an outbreak if it's one you're unfamiliar with
After the exams
- After the first day's exams, try to get a reasonable night's sleep
before the next day - try not to do too much extra revision that night,
and especially don't worry about how you did in the first two papers -
there's nothing you can do about it now
- After the last paper - congratulations! Your hand stayed in one
piece (just), and now you can relax (at least until the results are
nearly out)
- The results come out about 6 weeks after the written paper. At the
time of writing, these were only available by post - not by phone or
internet. Also, the estimated date for publication was put back on
about 3 occasions, so don't get too nervous before the results are first
'supposed' to be out - they may not arrive in the post that day!
I'd recommend Dr Jessop's
course without hesitation. It lasts a couple of days and is a
rapid review of the majority of topics you'll need to know. There's no
intimidating picking on people (if you've had bad revision course
experiences before!) and he's very pragmatic. The notes which are
available on his website are
very good, but make more sense after you've been to the course.
A local one for me, but the Oxford
University HERC one-day course was an excellent introduction to health
economics.
Please let me know of any other courses you've heard of, or been on, which are good.
Everyone will have their favourite textbook for different subjects, but
these are some of the books I found useful. Unfortunately there are no
textbooks which purport to cover all of the Part A syllabus yet (although
see Not yet published..., below). Most books here are
good to dip in and out of - don't feel compelled to read each in its
entirety. Also, remember that textbooks date quite quickly, so you may want
to complement your reading with a bit of internet
surfing for updated information.
(I've given the link to the Amazon.co.uk page for each text for
convenience.)
General topics
Pencheon, D et al. Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice (2e). ISBN:
0198566557 Very useful short, pragmatic chapters on a wide variety
of public health topics. I've got the first edition, but assume this
second edition is as good if not better
Donaldson LJ & Donaldson RJ. Essential Public Health (2e). ISBN 190060387X
I was initially quite sceptical about the relevance of this book - the cover
is quite old-fashioned - but it has very readable, in-depth chapters about
lots of useful topics including fertility rates, mental health, care of the
elderly and environmental health
Farmer, R and Lawrenson R. (Lecture Notes on) Epidemiology and Public Health
Medicine (5e). ISBN: 1405106743 Okay, so maybe quite a lot of it
is basic, but the chapter on health targets gives very concise summaries of
the epidemiology of major diseases over time
Detels R et al. Oxford Textbook of Public Health (4e). ISBN: 0198509596
For my money slightly erratic, but still useful for reference. The chapters
are very detailed, perhaps a bit too detailed for this level - I found it
often took too long to distil out the relevant material - but the
contributors are usually leaders in their field. I didn't use this as
much as I thought I might, but it does look good on your shelf!
Health economics
I didn't (and don't) have one! I found a combination of notes I had
taken on the
Oxford University HERC one-day course and
Ed Jessop's revision course
sufficient
Statistics and epidemiology
Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential Medical Statistics (2e). ISBN: 0865428719
Very approachable, but later chapters are probably too in-depth for the MFPH
Sociology
Scambler G. Sociology as Applied to Medicine (5e). ISBN: 0702026654
Not all relevant, but useful introduction to concepts such as the sick role
and deviance
Organisations and management
Handy, C. Understanding Organizations (4e). ISBN: 0140156038
Perhaps not as good as some evangelists make out, but a useful reference for
looking up specific terms, and surprisingly cheap by 'textbook' standards. I
found the chapters on power particularly helpful
Health protection
Hawker, J et al. Communicable Disease Control Handbook (2e). ISBN:
1405124245 Excellent summaries of all the diseases you could ever
want (so to speak!)
Not yet published...
Lewis et al, Mastering Public Health ISBN: 1853157813 Not
published yet (due Dec 2007) - so I'm afraid I can't say whether it's any
good. However, I plan to review the book shortly for the site. In
theory, this may be the answer to Part A candidates' prayers!
For most topics you're probably best off doing a
Google search, but these are some
specific sites I found useful.
Statistics
Jason
Newsom's stats notes (Portland University) - absolutely fantastic (in my
view!), very readable introduction to basic and intermediate stats
Statistics at
square one (BMJ, 1997) - whole book online
Statsoft electronic
textbook of stats (StatSoft) - good reference site
Jonathan Marchini's
notes (University of Oxford)
Health protection
HPA - obvious perhaps, but gives good
overviews of loads of diseases
Chemical and other
incident checklists (HPA) - useful reference
NHS Policy
National Service Frameworks (DH)
NHS Screening - good
current information on screening programmes
Occupational health
RIDDOR - information on RIDDOR
COSHH - information on
COSHH (HSE)
Organisations and management
Strategy survival guide
(Cabinet Office) - useful overview of strategy
development
Managing change in
the NHS (SDO) - change management documents - quite long, but principles
useful
Critical appraisal
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools
(PHRU) - good
frameworks for critical appraisal; adapt, extend and personalise them as
necessary
My critical appraisal framework
(pdf, 11kb) - based initially on CASP, but with added extras
Topical issues
Try to look at some of the sites linked to on the
news sources page
when you get a chance, to keep up-to-date with major public health stories.
Some of these stories can also be found in the Public Healthy
news archive
General
Wikipedia - general encyclopedia,
good for health economics terms
Edmund Jessop's site - some
good revision notes, and includes details of Ed's courses
Health Knowledge - slightly
variable, but some good articles nonetheless
Howard
J, MFPH Exams (BMJ Career Focus, 2008)
Revision advice from Catherine Heffernan 'Top ten' Part A tips
Any other suggestions? Please drop me a line.